Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cosmo-eccodes-definitions: Update maintainers #1034

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dominichofer
Copy link
Contributor

@dominichofer dominichofer commented Nov 26, 2024

@petrabaumann I'm leaving MeteoSwiss. So this package needs a new maintainer. Are you willing to adopt it? Since you create new cosmo-eccodes-definitions, I think you would be a fit.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 26, 2024

PR Preview Action v1.4.8
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2024-11-27 08:32 UTC

@petrabaumann
Copy link

petrabaumann commented Nov 26, 2024 via email

@dominichofer
Copy link
Contributor Author

dominichofer commented Nov 26, 2024

Hi @petrabaumann

As a maintainer you would be asked to review pull requests, which change this package description. By "package description" I mean the code in repos/c2sm/packages/cosmo-eccodes-definitions/package.py. If problems pop up with this package or package description, people would first contact you for help.
I think it would be nice if you would add new versions, deprecate and remove old and unused versions in the package description, not because you are a maintainer, but because you know what is used, when new versions are released, and what can be deprecated. Spack-c2sm developers will help you integrate, debug, and test new versions in spack-c2sm.
Would you do that?

Copy link

@petrabaumann petrabaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, I agree to take over the role of the maintainer.
I already have a suggestion for a change:
depends_on('[email protected]',
type=('build', 'link', 'run'),
when='@2.25.0.1:')$
should be replaced by
depends_on('[email protected]',
type=('build', 'link', 'run'),
when='@2.25.0.1:'2.25.0.3)
Who would review, if I created a PR for that?

@dominichofer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Anyone can review any PR.

@dominichofer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Since 2.25.0.3 is currently the highest version number listed in this package description,
depends_on('[email protected]', type=('build', 'link', 'run'), when='@2.25.0.1:')
and
depends_on('[email protected]', type=('build', 'link', 'run'), when='@2.25.0.1:'2.25.0.3)
are technically equivalent, because @2.25.0.1: means "2.25.0.1 and higher". But since they are equivalent, such a refactoring would be easy to review.

@dominichofer dominichofer merged commit a6dffef into main Nov 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@dominichofer dominichofer deleted the dominichofer-patch-2 branch November 27, 2024 08:32
@petrabaumann
Copy link

Thanks for the explanation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants